Assumption of Risk vs. Comparative Fault: In a Products Liability Case Resulting in Property Damage, Assumption of Risk Is Not a Defense, and the Plaintiff's Fault Must Be Evaluated and Compared with That of the Other Parties

Authors

David R. Owen

Recommended Citation

Owen, David R. (1985) "Assumption of Risk vs. Comparative Fault: In a Products Liability Case Resulting in Property Damage, Assumption of Risk Is Not a Defense, and the Plaintiff's Fault Must Be Evaluated and Compared with That of the Other Parties," Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce: Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 7.
Available at: https://docs.rwu.edu/law_ma_jmlc/vol16/iss1/7